PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
RESOLVED, that the city council finds the following:
(a) White Pine Development has submitted to the city council a special use permit request for a low density planned development on 144 acres of property legally described as follows:
(1) Those parts of Section 33, Township 51 North, Range 13 West of the Fourth Principal Meridian in the city of Duluth, county of St. Louis, state of Minnesota, summarized and described as follows: The NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4; the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4; the Plat of Lakeview Manor, except Lot 28 of Block 3 all in the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4; and
(2) Those parts of Section 34, Township 51 North, Range 13 West of the Fourth Principal Meridian in the city of Duluth, county of St. Louis, state of Minnesota, summarized and described as follows: The SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 and the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 lying north of the northerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 61; that part of the following listed lots lying north of the northerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 61 of Block 1 in the Plat of Brighton Gardens, First Division: Lots numbered 3 through 12, 27 through 31, and Lot 33; and
(b) Said permit application was duly referred to the city planning commission for a study, report, and public hearing held during the regular meeting on June 10, 2008, and the commission has subsequently reported its recommendation of conditional approval to the city council; and
(c) The applicant’s proposal will result in a random pattern of development with little contiguity to existing or programmed development, causing anticipated negative fiscal or environmental impacts upon the community; and
(5) That the special use permit petitioned by white pine development is hereby denied for the following reasons [reasons for denial to be filled in by council]:
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE: This resolution denies a low density planned development special use permit to white pine development because it would result in a random pattern of development with little contiguity to existing or programmed development, causing anticipated negative fiscal or environmental impacts upon the community.
The planning commission unanimously recommended approval of the special use permit request at their regular meeting held June 10, 2008.
City planning and city engineering staff continue to recommend that the project be denied in its current form (utilizing septic systems) for the following reasons:
1. The city council in Resolution 08-0332, approved on May 27, 2008, established a policy that developments on the upper side of the Highway 61 Expressway be served by sanitary sewer in order to better preserve the sensitive natural features of the North Shore and Lake Superior.
2. That the permitting of the Eastridge Estates development without sanitary sewer connections will be in conflict with this policy and, further, that it will harm the City’s ability to extend sanitary sewers to potential development sites northeast of the Eastridge Estates development due to the great cost of extending sewer past the Eastridge project.
Petition received: 3/25/2008
Action deadline: 7/23/2008